PROPRIETARY CAPABILITY
Leadership Risk
Intelligence
HTM's proprietary diagnostic platform translates leadership wellbeing data into executive-grade risk intelligence — providing early warning of organisational risk before it manifests as programme failure, leadership departure, or cultural breakdown.
LRRD — AVAILABLE NOW
Leadership Risk & Resilience Diagnostic
The LRRD translates a participant's survey responses into an executive-grade risk and resilience profile — a picture of an individual's wellbeing pressures and the organisational risks they imply. It is grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), structured across three domains: Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness, each containing multiple sub-domains measuring distinct aspects of leadership sustainability.
Autonomy
Competence
Relatedness
SDT-grounded
Psychometrically validated
Culturally calibrated
Access the LRRD
LEWRI — IN DEVELOPMENT
Leadership Early Warning Risk Index
The LEWRI will extend the LRRD's individual-level insight to the programme level — aggregating leadership risk signals across a delivery team into a single, governance-ready index for assessing major programme delivery risk. The LEWRI is currently in design, with its construct architecture informed directly by the validated sub-domains of the LRRD.
Programme-level risk
Delivery risk translation
PMO integration
Design stage
THE LRRD IN DETAIL
How the diagnostic works
Survey-based self-report
Participants complete a structured survey instrument — validated for psychometric integrity and calibrated for cultural context. Responses are scored across Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness sub-domains.
Profile generation
Survey responses are translated into an executive-grade risk and resilience profile — mapping the pattern of wellbeing pressures, identifying early warning signals, and quantifying organisational risk implications.
Risk and intervention report
The LRRD report provides a clear, actionable narrative — presenting domain-level risk ratings, sub-domain insights, and targeted recommendations for intervention, coaching, or governance response.
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
Grounded in Self-Determination Theory
Autonomy
The degree to which a leader experiences ownership and volition over their work — including sub-domains covering decision latitude, values alignment, workload agency, energy and recovery sustainability, and boundary management.
Competence
The degree to which a leader feels effective and capable — covering sub-domains including role clarity, strategic alignment, feedback quality, adaptive capacity and change absorption, and AI-era decision complexity.
Relatedness
The degree to which a leader feels genuinely connected — covering sub-domains including psychological safety, social support quality, team cohesion, and the ability to seek help without stigma in both professional and personal contexts.
PSYCHOMETRIC STANDARDS
Rigour as a non-negotiable
The LRRD is designed to meet professional-grade psychometric standards: validated response direction, construct validity across sub-domains, culturally calibrated interpretive frameworks, and ethical reporting practices that include clear professional support signposting. Normative benchmarking is provided only where adequate reference samples support it.
ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY